Question 297
HardOriginal questionNo one would have believed in the last years of the nineteenth century that this world was being watched keenly and closely by intelligences greater than man’s and yet as mortal as his own; that as men busied themselves about their various concerns they were and studied, perhaps almost as narrowly as a man with a microscope might scrutinise the creatures that swarm and multiply in a drop of water. With infinite men went to and fro over this globe about their little affairs, serene in their assurance of their empire over matter. It is possible that the infusoria under the microscope do the same. No one gave a thought to the older worlds of space as sources of human danger, or thought of them only to dismiss the idea of life upon them as impossible or improbable. It is curious to recall some of the mental habits of those departed days. At most men fancied there might be other men upon Mars, perhaps inferior to themselves and ready to welcome a missionary enterprise. Yet across the gulf of space, minds that are to our minds as ours are to those of the beasts that perish, intellects vast and cool and unsympathetic, regarded this earth with envious eyes, and slowly and surely drew their plans against us. And early in the twentieth century came the great .
Humans are compared to tiny creatures in a drop of water, watched by a man with a microscope. What does the comparison suggest?
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: A
Explanation
Just as tiny creatures "swarm and multiply" without knowing they are watched, humans "went to and fro" about "their little affairs".
The watchers are as far above humans as a scientist is above the creatures on his slide.
Worth noting
The comparison is about the size of the difference between watcher and watched, not about science being dangerous.
- Concept
- Interpreting an extended comparison
- Typical timeTypical
- 55 s
- Your timeYours
- —
Ten questions from Literary passages, at your own pace.