Every economy has less than it wants, so it must choose. This lesson explains scarcity, the three central problems (what, how and for whom to produce), the production possibility curve and why it bows outward, opportunity cost and the marginal rate of transformation, and how market, planned and mixed economies decide, with worked examples and the traps CUET sets.
Wants are unlimited, but the land, labour, capital and skills to meet them are limited, and each of them can be used in more than one way. So every economy, rich or poor, has to choose. Economics is the study of those choices.
Two questions decide most marks in this chapter: what a point on, inside or outside the PPC means, and what the PPC's shape says about opportunity cost.
Microeconomics studies individual units: one consumer, one firm, one market. How the price of onions is set, or how a family spends its income, are micro questions. Macroeconomics studies the economy as a whole through aggregates: national income, the general price level, total employment.
Watch out
The branch is decided by the unit studied, not by the good. One family's spending on petrol is micro; the inflation rate is macro, even though both involve prices.
Because resources are scarce relative to wants and have alternative uses. Scarcity does not mean absence: even a rich country cannot have everything at once.
A production possibility curve shows the combinations of two goods an economy can produce when it uses its given resources and technology fully and efficiently. It is also called the production possibility frontier.
A: resources idle. B: full and efficient use. C: out of reach with today's resources.
Point
Where it is
What it means
On the curve
B
Resources fully and efficiently used
Inside
A
Unemployment or waste of resources
Outside
C
Not attainable with current resources and technology
Moving from A to B gives more of both goods without giving anything up, because A had idle resources. Moving along the curve, more of one good always means less of the other.
Resources are not equally good at producing both goods. The first resources moved into wheat are those best suited to it; later ones are less suited, so each extra tonne of wheat costs more and more cloth. A rising cost makes the curve steeper as it goes right: concave to the origin.
The value of the next best alternative given up. If a plot could grow wheat worth ₹40,000, rice worth ₹55,000 or pulses worth ₹48,000, the opportunity cost of wheat is ₹55,000, the best alternative, not the sum of the two.
The units of one good given up to produce one more unit of the other. It is the slope of the PPC.
Marginal rate of transformation
MRT=ΔXΔY=extra unit of Xunits of Y given up
Example 1 · MRT from a schedule
An economy can produce these combinations: wheat 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 tonnes with cloth 20, 18, 15, 11, 6 lakh metres. Find the MRT at each step.
Cloth given up per extra tonne of wheat: 20 − 18 = 2, 18 − 15 = 3, 15 − 11 = 4, 11 − 6 = 5.
The MRT rises: 2, 3, 4, 5. So the PPC is concave to the origin.
Answer
MRT = 2, 3, 4, 5: increasing opportunity cost
A straight-line PPC has a constant MRT: every extra unit of X costs the same amount of Y. That happens only if resources are equally efficient in both goods.
A positive statement says what is, and can be checked: "Unemployment rose last year." A normative statement says what ought to be, and carries a value judgement: "The government should give free electricity to farmers." Words like should, ought and fair mark a normative statement.
A farmer can grow wheat worth ₹40,000, rice worth ₹55,000 or pulses worth ₹48,000 on a plot. He grows wheat. What is the opportunity cost of growing wheat?
Show the explanationHide the explanation
AnswerC · ₹55,000
The alternatives given up are rice (₹55,000) and pulses (₹48,000).
The next best of these is rice, so the opportunity cost is ₹55,000.
Worth noting
₹1,03,000 adds both alternatives; only the best one forgone counts.
A firm uses its own building, which it could rent out for ₹30,000 a month, instead of renting it. In deciding whether the business pays, this ₹30,000 is
Show the explanationHide the explanation
AnswerB · an opportunity cost that should be counted
By using the building, the firm gives up the rent it could have earned.
That forgone rent is a real cost of the choice even though no cash changes hands.
Assertion (A): 'Inflation should be kept below 4%' is a positive statement.
Reason (R): A normative statement expresses an opinion about what ought to be.
Show the explanationHide the explanation
AnswerD · A is false, but R is true.
The word 'should' makes it a judgement about what ought to be, so it is normative and A is false.
R correctly defines a normative statement.
NTA's Economics syllabus is three courses: Introductory Microeconomics, Introductory Macroeconomics and Indian Economic Development, each split into units with a list of topics. It prints no chapters and no split of the 50 questions across the courses. So the areas here are NTA's three courses, and the chapters inside them are ours: a unit that covers several ideas, such as consumer behaviour and demand, is split into a chapter for each, so that a chapter can be practised in one sitting. All three courses are here.